NHTC Logo
Your Account Button
About Us Button
Services Button
Investing Button
Our Fees Button
FAQ Button
Links Button
Contact Button

Home Button

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump to Top

Trust Topic - Should a Family Member Serve as Trustee?

One of my responsibilities is risk management. It's my job to monitor compliance with the fiduciary obligations that govern the action of trustees. So, when I recently attended a conference sponsored by the Association of Independent Trust Companies, I headed for the session titled “Fiduciary Liability.”

The presenter was from an insurance company that covers professional trustees. He told a story about a recent $3 million settlement against a trustee of a relatively conventional personal trust. A husband had set up the trust to provide income to his wife and son for life. Upon his wife's death, the trust principal was to be distributed to the son's children. The trust also provided that if the son did not have children, the trust would be distributed to a charity. The trustee invested the assets in order to maximize income for the widow. Upon the wife's death, the trustee distributed the trust to the charity. The son had predeceased her without issue.

The charity sued the trustee. Why? On the theory that the trustee had breached his duty of impartiality by favoring the income beneficiaries over the charity's interest, the charity alleged that the trustee should have invested more money in the stock market .The charity negotiated an attractive settlement. (I suspect the suit was filed before the end of 1999).

We hope the trustee in that story was not a family member.

Asking a family member to serve as trustee may seem prudent, but the job may be an unintended Trojan horse. The relative may be honored by the request and agree that it makes good sense. However, he or she may be saddled with unexpected and unwanted burdens, such as:

  • Exposure to unforeseen plaintiffs. These parties may be contingent remaindermen like an aggressive alma mater, spouses of deceased children, or jealous siblings, to name a few.
  • Confusing tax implications of trust administration. Trust tax matters are growing increasingly more complex, fueled in part by the complexities of funding trusts with IRA's.
  • Unintended consequences of administrative decisions. Actions of a surviving spouse who is trustee can destroy the estate-tax-exempt feature of a trust.
I work with professional corporate trustees. Hence, I may have a bias or two about the business. I am aware of one such bias. I am part of a group that has spent years learning our trade, so I would naturally look askance at do-it-yourself trustees and some of its promoters.

I have seen basically two types of promoters of do-it-yourself trusteeship. The first type is a "Relationship Controller," whose motive is to tether the client to its own fees in the guise of saving the family expenses elsewhere. The second type is the "Disheartened." These are individuals who feel that many corporate professional trustees are not serving their clients well. This latter group has witnessed a trend in the trust business, most notably in bank trust departments and trust units of brokerage houses, where the trustees' motives seem centered on selling investment products and increasing fee revenue rather than maintaining a high standard of personal service.

Many attorneys fall within the second category, the Disheartened. It is understandable that they would want you to avoid trapping your family in a long-term relationship with a corporation that may be undergoing a series of mergers and consolidations that increasingly limit access to your trustee and substitute a remote "800" number for local service. In many instances, it is a good idea to name family members as trustees as long as there is an infrastructure in place to support them.

In this connection, let's take a look at the responsibilities that need to be supported:

  • Understand the document and fiduciary law -- To administer the trust according to law and in accordance with the trust agreement. In addition to understanding the document, the trustee should have an understanding of his or her duties as required by New Hampshire law, including the rules of fiduciary accounting both as to common law and statutes such as the Uniform Principal and Income Act.
  • Compliance with tax rules and regulations -- To understand the tax consequences of his or her acts and tax accounting rules (particularly where they depart from fiduciary accounting rules), and to file state and federal tax returns.
  • Maintaining separate income and principal records -- The trustee has a duty not to mingle trust assets with non-trust assets and to maintain records that have separate income and principal ledgers. Further, the trustee has the ongoing responsibility to:
  • • Collect all trust receipts and determine whether each receipt is principal or income, or whether it should be allocated between both.
    • Pay all expenses and determine whether each expense is principal or income or allocable between the two.
    • For an income beneficiary, the trustee must calculate the amount of income due and distribute these funds according to the terms of the trust.
  • Exercise reasonable discretion -- If the trustee is given discretion with respect to a matter, to exercise that discretion in a reasonable manner.
  • Impartiality -- To administer the trust impartially for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries, regarding the interests of both the current beneficiaries and the remainder beneficiaries. The trustee must remain impartial and not favor any beneficiary(s) over another,especially if he or she is also a beneficiary.
  • Preserve -- To protect and preserve the assets of the trust estate.
  • Prudence -- To invest the trusts assets in a prudent and cautious manner.
  • Avoidance of conflicts -- To avoid conflicts of interest, such as entering into transactions with trust property that will result in a profit to the trustee personally.

In a nutshell, family members need:

• Investment advice from someone who is familiar with the obligations of a trustee in investing assets;
• Assistance with fiduciary accounting and 1041 tax returns; and
• Help in translating the trust document and assisting in the ongoing decisions regarding receipts and disbursements.

There are not a lot of individuals qualified to provide this infra-structure. However, the family member can also engage the services of a professional corporate trustee, including a bank trust department, to act as their agent. In that case, we recommend negotiating relationships that will not be difficult to terminate and which will not be subject to expensive exit fees.

The family member can also serve as co-trustee with a corporate trustee. In some situations, this will be a sensible solution.

However, there will be many instances when it is advisable to use a corporate trustee that acts as sole trustee. In that case, we recommend that if you name a corporate trustee to serve as sole trustee or co-trustee, then you would also benefit from giving power to a majority in interest of the income beneficiaries to replace the corporate trustee with another corporate trustee. Including this provision in the trust will increase the likelihood that the corporate trustee will remain responsive to family needs. Doing so will also prevent beneficiaries from shopping around for an individual trustee willing to “bend the rules” in ways you did not intend, or someone who is simply not qualified to act. Unlike individuals, a corporate trustee is subject to State oversight for compliance with fiduciary rules and obligations (your local law or accounting firm cannot act as a corporate trustee unless specifically empowered and licensed by the State to perform fiduciary services).

In selecting a trustee, your attorney can provide helpful guidance. If you decide to use a family member as trustee, play it safe and ask your lawyer where you will be able to find the support services.

Jack Davidson, NHTC Board Member

Links

I still encounter lawyers who take the position that if the surviving spouse acts as the sole trustee of the Bypass Trust, the estate tax savings feature will be lost. The code and regs do not support this position if the principal invasion clause is limited by "ascertainable standards". See Standards.

However, it is critically important that the draftsman stays within the tight confines that have been established. See Ascertainable .

Some lawyers feel strongly that allowing the spousal trustee to operate within the safety of "ascertainable standards" will still expose the trust to taxation in the surviving spouse's estate, if he or she exceeds the standards. This is a legitimate concern and supports the thesis of this article.

Comments about this article? Please email Jack

Home  l  About Us  l  Services  l  Investment Group & Process  l  Our Fees
   Frequently Asked Questions  l  Contact Us 
Useful Forms  l  Trust Topics
Investment Newsletter  l  Our Board  l  Attorney Info  l  Community Room